A HYBRID STRATEGY FOR EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION BASED ON TWO CONTENT THEORIES
What is Motivation
Employee motivation has become very critical for all the
organization and the theme is considered as one that discuss most at current
environment situations to enhance the motivation of the employees as well as
get the best out of the employees. The content theories in motivation are
mainly focused on the needs of the employees and the humans which I focused on ERG Theory and McClelland’s Theory of Needs
as well as the possibilities to develop a hybrid motivation strategy for firm
to motivate their employees.
According to Hunter
et al (1990) the difference between superior and standard performances are
based on the level of the motivation of an employee. Arnold et al (1991) argues
that the deciding factor of a better outcome of what he tries to do, the degree
of effort he puts and for how long he keeps trying will depend on the
motivation level of an employee for a said duty.
Hence motivation is
very much important to a company since the high motivation will deliver a
higher result and highly motivated staffs are always a competitive advantage to
a company.
ERG Theory
As per Alderfer
(1972) all humans have need to satisfy where the needs can be separate for
three prime categories. Existence needs such as hunger and shelter, relatedness
needs such as interacting with other humans, and growth needs where people
looking for opportunities. Further he
says that people are highly motivated in order to satisfy those needs.
This theory can use
in organizations in the form of incentives, rewards, working conditions and
rules in order to motive employees. Rewards and other opportunities can be
awarded based on the performances to satisfy their needs if perform up to a
certain level of expectation. This will be a motivation factor to perform since
such rewards will leads to satisfy their needs. Attractive salaries, fringe
benefits, commissions, and rewards can be motives for the satisfaction of
existence needs. Acceptance, confirmation and recognition can be used as a motive
factor for those who look to satisfy relatedness needs. Finally, proper
evaluations, talent management, and promotion opportunities can use to motivate
the employees with a satisfaction need of growth needs.
In practically it
is very impossible to identify the different needs of the people at a same time
since different people have different needs and even a same person might have
different needs at a given time with different priorities. Further even for a
same need people might have different wants in order to satisfy said needs. The
challenge is to identify those differences and come out with common satisfaction
motives.
McClelland’s Theory of Needs
Based on a study of
managers McClelland argues that there are three (03) main and most important
needs of a manager which he tries to satisfy. Need for achievement where the
need of the manager is the competitive success. Need for affiliation where the
manager is motivated warm and close relationship with others. Need for power
where manager need to have more controls and influences over others (Armstrong,
2009).
In different levels
of the management the managers may motivate to fulfil different levels of needs
where the operational level managers’ motivation is to satisfy the need
achievement and middle level managers are more concern to satisfy affiliation
needs whereas the strategic level managers’ motive is to satisfy the power
need. Hence this theory can be used to identify the need motive of the manager
in order to offer opportunities for such satisfactions based on performances.
But since the needs
are always personal the same level managers might have different need motives
based on the personality, perceptions and career targets. Further the changing
environment may lead to shifts in need priorities.
Proposed Hybrid Strategy for Motivation
Both theories are
content (Need related) theories where needs are a basic part of human character
and people always try to satisfy those needs. Further the I believe that all
the motivation theories are based on satisfy a human need in different manner
and those needs have been focused as levers of motivation.
The ERG theory
discusses the general motives of need satisfaction of human, and these needs can
consider as motivation factors. Further McClelland’s theory specially discusses
on needs of managers and the hybrid strategy will consider all the needs of
employees and especially on managers since the demand for such talents in the
market is very high and the scarcity of such talents.
The existence and
relatedness need which are discusses in ERG theory which contains working
environment, salaries, and acceptance etc. represents most of the hygiene
factors of Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory and the growth needs represent some of
the Motive factors. Hence the application of ERG theory is very critical and
advisable. Further the growth and achievement needs are considered in both
theories which can satisfy through career development where the career
development can be consider as valence factor which discussed in equity theory.
The ultimate
objective is to full fill the need demand of the employees from the
contribution of the organization in terms of income, benefits, status, and
career etc. whereas the company demands in terms of organizational goals,
departmental objectives, and job tasks etc. to be full filled by the
contribution from the employees in terms of knowledge, skills, abilities, and
developmental potentials.
References
Alderfer, C. (1972), Existence, Relatedness, and Growth, New
York, The Free Press.
Armstrong, M. (2009), Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resources Management Practice, 11th
Edition, London, Kogan Page.
Arnorld, J., Robertson, I.T, & Cooper, C.L (1991), Work Psychology, London, Pitman.
Hunter, J.E., Schmidt,
F.L., & Judiesch, M.K. (1990), Individual Differences in Output Variability
as a Function of Job Complexity, Journal
of Applied Psychology, 75 (01), 28-42.
Hi Rasika, Agreed on the content. Further, in ERG theory, when relatedness needs are met, more relatedness needs will be needed, and vice versa once growth needs are met (Young, Young & Scientist, 2021). The ERG concept proposed by Alderfer has been used to construct communication technology (Yang, Hwang & Chen, 2011). If the employees has not yet formed a dominating force in the work, they may not feel comfortable focusing on the growth and development of relationships without developing workplace identity (Pratap, A, 2017).
ReplyDeleteYes, I hope, there is a development of the growth in the work place
Delete